Personalized Bridal Shower Chapstick

FALL SCHOOL: STRUCTURES uncertain, risk 2 3 SU

CROLLO SCUOLA: STRUTTURE INSICURE, A RISCHIO 2 SU 3

old, maintenance-free, built in areas of high seismic risk, and electrical systems are not always in accordance, not to mention the fire prevention certificate and dell'agibilità 'static. Italian schools are unsafe, and the tragedy of Turin, where the collapse of the roof of a school has caused the death of a 17 year old student, does is confirm a dramatic trend. Three out of four schools, according to Codacons, are not up to standard.

Only 25% of the buildings, in fact, both the certificate of fitness for use 'static, both the practicability of' health and hygiene, fire prevention is the certificate. Pessimistic analysis? Probably not, if the same Ministry of Education after a survey has identified 10 thousand schools unsafe. And a recent survey of Legambiente adds: a student who enters the school in the world today has a great chance 'of being in a dilapidated old building (52.8% and' was built before 1974, that 'before they entered force in the current criteria for earthquake resistant buildings), and maintenance-free. Just 6.26% of the buildings have been built in recent times, from 1990 to 2006, and resists a 4.49% which dates back to 800 if not before.

Less than half 'of schools, 47.11%, has enjoyed some attention to the extraordinary care over the past 5 years, and 23.62% would require urgent attention. Not to mention the sports facilities, which often are optional (the 36.57% of our schools and it 'completely off guard) and the seismic risk: three out of four schools are built right in high-risk areas, but 40% do not have the certificate of fitness for use' static. And the Piedmont stands for the age 'of its schools: nearly half' (47.7%) and 'was built before 1974, and 41.4% (including the high school Rivoli) and' housed in buildings historians.

Source: Republic